PDA

View Full Version : WWE's 50 Greatest Tag Teams



mrluck_07
07-15-2018, 12:08 AM
WWE compiled this list back in 2012.

Criteria:

1. Only WWE teams were eligible.
2. Teams were rated only on their accomplishments while in WWE.
3. Eligibility began with the first recognized World Tag Team Champions, Luke Graham & Tarzan Tyler, who won the titles on June 3, 1971.
4. Rankings were based on everything from longevity to cultural impact. Personal biases may have also crept in.


50. The Bushwhackers
49. The Soul Patrol
48. Paul London & Brian Kendrick
47. The Twin Towers
46. The Headshrinkers
45. The Moondogs
44. Booker T & Goldust
43. Killer Bees
42. Powers of Pain
41. Jeri-Show
40. The World's Greatest Tag Team
39. The Bodydonnas
38. U.S. Express
37. Team Lay-Cool
36. The Steiners
35. The Legacy
34. The Foreign Legion
33. Kane & X-Pac
32. MNM
31. Too Cool
30. The Mega Powers
29. The Brain Busters
28. Colossal Connection
27. The Quebecers
26. Rated-RKO
25. Los Guerreros
24. The Smoking Gunns
23. The Natural Disasters
22. John Morrison & The Miz
21. The Nasty Boys
20. Team Hell No
19. Money, Inc.
18. D-Generation X
17. Mr. Fuji & Professor Toru Tanaka
16. The Brothers of Destruction
15. Strike Force
14. The Rock 'N' Sock Connection
13. The Blackjacks
12. The APA
11. The Rockers
10. The Dudley Boyz
9. The Wild Samoans
8. Legion of Doom
7. The Valiant Brothers
6. The British Bulldogs
5. The Hardy Boyz
4. The New Age Outlaws
3. Demolition
2. The Hart Foundation
1. Edge & Christian

What do you guys think? Are there any teams you would substitute in?

BestSportsEntertainer
07-15-2018, 12:46 AM
Considering how difficult it is to rank literally every tag team over a 40 year period, it's not that bad of a list.

ShinChan
07-15-2018, 03:55 AM
I really need to catch up as I don't know half of them. Really weak in wrestling history. ��

A11
07-15-2018, 06:39 AM
I'd have the dudley boys higher

Yer Maw
07-15-2018, 08:53 AM
London and Kendrick held the titles for over a year? They should be top 20 at Least.

#AbsoluteUnit
07-15-2018, 10:01 AM
I'm biased, but I really like the Hart Foundation, yet #2 seems like a reach. Otherwise I can't complain.

Jack-Hammer
07-15-2018, 04:16 PM
Well, as is the case whenever a list like this is compiled, there are some I think should be higher, some lower and some that shouldn't be on the list. As a whole, looking over this list, I think it's a good one.

As to Edge & Christian being #1, no complaints here as they have as much claim to it as anyone else on the list and more so than most.

Of those who I think should've been higher up, nobody sticks out to me more than the Steiner Brothers.

Of those I think should've been lower on the list, The Blackjacks are VASTLY too high up for a team with a single 74 day run.

Of those I think shouldn't be on the list at all, it's hard to pick who should be discarded the most between The Bushwhackers, Killer Bees or the Twin Towers. I know the Bushwhackers, AKA the Sheepherders, did well outside of WWE but they were crap while in WWE.

mrluck_07
07-24-2018, 09:45 AM
Well, as is the case whenever a list like this is compiled, there are some I think should be higher, some lower and some that shouldn't be on the list. As a whole, looking over this list, I think it's a good one.

As to Edge & Christian being #1, no complaints here as they have as much claim to it as anyone else on the list and more so than most.

Of those who I think should've been higher up, nobody sticks out to me more than the Steiner Brothers.

Of those I think should've been lower on the list, The Blackjacks are VASTLY too high up for a team with a single 74 day run.

Of those I think shouldn't be on the list at all, it's hard to pick who should be discarded the most between The Bushwhackers, Killer Bees or the Twin Towers. I know the Bushwhackers, AKA the Sheepherders, did well outside of WWE but they were crap while in WWE.

Had no idea their run was so short.

pinbuster
11-08-2018, 12:46 AM
Some tag teams that should have been included in my opinion. Tony Garea & Rick Martel - 2 time WWF tag team champions, Mr. Fuji & Mr. Saito - 3 time wwf tag team champions, The Strongbow Brothers - two time wwf tag team champions. One Qualification I would have had was them being Champions at least That's my opinion

LanceT71
12-30-2018, 03:48 PM
WWE compiled this list back in 2012.

Criteria:

1. Only WWE teams were eligible.
2. Teams were rated only on their accomplishments while in WWE.
3. Eligibility began with the first recognized World Tag Team Champions, Luke Graham & Tarzan Tyler, who won the titles on June 3, 1971.
4. Rankings were based on everything from longevity to cultural impact. Personal biases may have also crept in.



What do you guys think? Are there any teams you would substitute in?

Tito Santana and Ivan Putski
Iron Sheik and Nikolai Volkoff

Miko
02-06-2019, 04:24 AM
Charlie Haas and Rico should be top 10 imo, they formed amid hilarity to finally end the seemingly unstoppable reign of Scotty 2 Hotty and Rikishi, saw off challenges from teams that would have been dominant players in any other era but theirs, such as Hardcore Holly and Billy Gunn, and singlehandedly made the Dudley Boyz relevant

LouieD
02-18-2019, 04:05 AM
Wish you had started just a bit earlier - my #1 would be the Mongols. Beppo - the young Volkoff - was just as big and strong as ever but much more quick and agile than be would later become. He was simply awesome. As a singles competitor, he was consider a real threat to Bruno, As a team, they were simply awesome and generated real excitement into the WWWF. Beppo's collisions with the recently turned baby-face Monsoon were awesome to watch,