Unpopular/Controversial Opinions

[jmt225]

WCW Randy Savage was better than WWF Randy Savage.

[BaconBits]

WCW Randy Savage was better than WWF Randy Savage.

I can agree with that. His character tended to be a little more interesting in WCW.

[BestSportsEntertainer]

Easy bro, save some controversial opinions for the rest of us.

I think the majority of people would disagree with all of them.

[JGlass]

I think the majority of people would disagree with all of them.

Woosh

[BestSportsEntertainer]

I'm not in favor of the CFB playoffs expanding and have no problem with neutral site games

Video game companies should remake games much more often than they do now

[BaconBits]

EA feeding into the hulabaloo over Battlefield by saying â??There were tons of women who fought and died in WW2â? (which isnâ??t true) instead of just saying â??Itâ??s just a game, retardsâ? is the cringiest shit Iâ??ve ever seen a video game company do.

[Slyfox696]

EA feeding into the hulabaloo over Battlefield by saying “There were tons of women who fought and died in WW2” (which isn’t true) instead of just saying “It’s just a game, retards” is the cringiest shit I’ve ever seen a video game company do.

Is it even the worst thing EA has done in the last year? Surely the Battlefront disaster was worse.

“The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different heroes.” -EA, in response to overwhelming criticism about unlocking heroes.


Actually, on second thought...what exactly is the hubbub about Battlefield?

[Fallout]

I wouldn't call the Battlefront disaster cringey as much as it was completely antagonistic towards the consumer.

The Battlefield 5 hubbub is basically that they featured a woman with high-tech cyberpunk prosthetics (that don't even really exist in our current day and age) highly throughout the trailer...when the game is set during WW2 and is otherwise highly realistic.

I personally don't care all that much. It's stupid that they're trying so hard to appeal to the progressive activists without actually putting any effort into it outside of slapping women into a scenario they didn't partake in, much less with those kinds of prosthetics (it reminds me of that phase in media where they would make a character gay for no reason other than to try and increase marketability prospects), but when it comes down to it, it really doesn't matter. I won't buy the game, but to be honest, I wouldn't have bought the game anyway, and a whole host of people are over-reacting.

[BaconBits]

Is it even the worst thing EA has done in the last year? Surely the Battlefront disaster was worse.

“The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different heroes.” -EA, in response to overwhelming criticism about unlocking heroes.


Actually, on second thought...what exactly is the hubbub about Battlefield?

Fallout basically summed it up. There’s lots of criticism over the whole woman thing, and EA keeps insisting that the reason women are featured so promonently is that women were a huge part of combat in WW2, which isn’t anywhere near true.

Maybe they figure that’ll shut down the criticism. If they think that, they’re extraordinarily stupid.

[nightmare]

Women were a huge part during the war. Just not in the traditional sense or how EA would like to remember history.


Now on topic, Strong Style is this decades ECW. 90% of it is shit and Okada sucks. 37 lazy clotheslines shouldnt mean you had a good match.