KB Answers Wrestling Questions

[A11]

Hypothetically if the wwe didnt sign a new tv deal and moved it all to the network, how much of an increase to the price of the network would be justifiable?

[Dave]

I asked this in another thread but might as well ask here.

Can you think of anyone who the WWE has tried harder to make a star than Roman Reigns?

[klunderbunker]

Hypothetically if the wwe didnt sign a new tv deal and moved it all to the network, how much of an increase to the price of the network would be justifiable?

At least double it, though it would be suicide.

I asked this in another thread but might as well ask here.

Can you think of anyone who the WWE has tried harder to make a star than Roman Reigns?

Lex Luger and that's about it.

[Yaz]

I need your expertise to settle a debate.

In modern wrestling, on the outside of the ring you have barricade, the steel steps, the ring posts, the announcer's table. Throwing or Irish whipping or slamming your opponent into these objects is a common tactic among heels, though faces also do it. My buddy thinks it should be a DQ to do this, as they are foreign (international) objects and should be treated like any other weapon. I argue that the rules in place are correct because they are set pieces and the wrestler didn't bring them from outside the match.

He says that if the set piece argument were true, then anything you find under the ring is fair game, because the wrestler didn't introduce those, the crew did. I said, no, the stuff under the ring isn't part of the set, only the objects previously listed are. Who is being silly?

[Bill Lesnar]

Bill Lesnar has seen a rumor that Mysterio is Cenas opponent.

surely not.

[klunderbunker]

I need your expertise to settle a debate.

In modern wrestling, on the outside of the ring you have barricade, the steel steps, the ring posts, the announcer's table. Throwing or Irish whipping or slamming your opponent into these objects is a common tactic among heels, though faces also do it. My buddy thinks it should be a DQ to do this, as they are foreign (international) objects and should be treated like any other weapon. I argue that the rules in place are correct because they are set pieces and the wrestler didn't bring them from outside the match.

He says that if the set piece argument were true, then anything you find under the ring is fair game, because the wrestler didn't introduce those, the crew did. I said, no, the stuff under the ring isn't part of the set, only the objects previously listed are. Who is being silly?

WWE, who changes the rules to suit their stories.

You're both right, in a way. If someone whips someone into the steps, it may or may not be a DQ. If someone brings the steps into the ring and uses them, it's always a DQ. The answer I've heard given on commentary is about the referee deeming something goes too far. Given that it's been a DQ before to send someone into the exposed turnbuckle, the set piece argument doesn't really hold up. I've seen someone disqualified for taking their boot off and using that. How that's a weapon isn't clear, as it's legal to kick someone in the stomach with the boot on.

Overall, the rules are VERY lose but I'd go with what he's saying: if it's made of metal, it's going to be a DQ regardless of where it's supposed to be.

Bill Lesnar has seen a rumor that Mysterio is Cenas opponent.

surely not.

I'd be happy with it.

[SD619]

Has there been any interaction between KO and Wyatt (outside of Rumbles)?

[FunKay]

Best mask design in wrestling?

[klunderbunker]

Has there been any interaction between KO and Wyatt (outside of Rumbles)?

Not that I can recall.

Best mask design in wrestling?

Jushin Thunder Liger.

[Undying]

Didn't catch Raw, but reading your review I assume Reigns made no mention of Braun destroying him after the chamber am I right?