What do you think about the size of WWEs roster? Do you think they need to release some people or create a third brand after Raw and SD?
What do you think about the size of WWEs roster? Do you think they need to release some people or create a third brand after Raw and SD?
They need to find a way to actually book their talent better. This stuff with having five people in so many matches i nonsense. A third bran wouldn't help things though as the creative staff can't handle two brands, let alone three.
Do you think how they're trying to get Roman cheered is going to help?
The WWE pays Brock Lesnar $12m (a year?) for his limited dates. This is far, far more than anyone else on the roster. Do you think that he is worth that? Also, do you think, like I do, that they've taken Brock as far as they can go and should consider not offering him a new deal?
Seems ridiculous to me that they're paying him 12x more than most of the wrestlers on the roster for working 1/10 of the dates. He'll not care one bit but it must liss the rest of the roster off to see that. Especially people like Neville who didn't get any royalties from the Mania DVD and to whom money means a great deal more.
The next highest paid guy is Cena at 8 million a year. Triple H is third at 3.8 million. Roman at 3.5 is the highest paid full time guy. Dean (2.7) AJ (2.4) Shane (2.2) Undertaker (2) Rollins (2) and Orton (1.9) round out the top ten from 2017. So yeah, paying Lesnar nearly 4x as much as your biggest full time wrestler is too much in my opinion.
That is a bit much yeah.
Bill Lesnar asks how much better/over Zayn and Owens would be if they dedicated themselves to improving their physiques like Jinder Mahal did.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)